Vancouver Fan, Markie Mark, Scott W, Sharky... all extremely good... Same with Moon, Sal, etc. Really, following anyone in this forum would be smart. ScottW's picks you've gotta search through some threads for, but usually they land in my thread. The guy I wouldn't suggest tailing is me, as I'm still in my first season, though I've stopped calling this an experiment.
Also, if you'd like you can listen to about 95% of the games online. If you can wade through the BS from my week 1 thread, ScottW posted all of the links to the radio broadcasts of each team on the last page. Tonight you should be able to get an Alouette pickup of the game here...
http://www.cjad.com/
Best-
--AFLGuru
Also, if you'd like you can listen to about 95% of the games online. If you can wade through the BS from my week 1 thread, ScottW posted all of the links to the radio broadcasts of each team on the last page. Tonight you should be able to get an Alouette pickup of the game here...
http://www.cjad.com/
Best-
--AFLGuru
I was wrong about the line movement though... even though I got better juice on TFZ, at absolute worst, Montreal is -4.5 at some shops.
You'll learn that I like to talk my way through my selections, as I often times get feedback from guys like Scott, Sharky, Mark, TommyB (I think only an AFL guy... haven't seen him for CFL of yet) on my analysis. As I said, especially with the CFL, it's my first season following this league and I'm merely relating the league to the AFL. I listen to every game I can, thus make too many bets that I shouldn't make on this game.
When I post an AFL card, I really mean it and think I'm going 100% on every card I post (though I know that's unrealistic to say the least). When I post a CFL card, I'm fully aware that there are times I'm either making wagers under the premise of winning a small dollar amount on the game (like the Toronto/Winnepeg game on Monday or the Edmonton game the week before) when I make 3 or 4 bets that correspond with what I think is going to happen in the game from all standpoints, knowing that I'm usually looking at a maximum reward vs. minimum risk proposition. Sometimes it works out great, like the over in the BC/Calgary game last week, when I netted over 9 units on the game, something I never even tried in the AFL (mostly because I never experimented with team totals and the fact that 1st half wagers in the AFL are really dumb unless you know who's getting the ball first). Other times it doesn't, like the Winnepeg game should have been for me on Monday.
I'll drop 5 unit plays on the AFL maybe not on a weekly basis, but probably 20 5 unit plays a year. I've yet to do that in the CFL, and only this week did I bring out my 2nd 4 unit play (though I've risked as much as 10 units on an actual game).
See what I mean that I like to talk my way through things? I'm still just 20 and have a long way to go in this biz and hope to always get feedback from those higher than me in the gambling world.
You'll learn that I like to talk my way through my selections, as I often times get feedback from guys like Scott, Sharky, Mark, TommyB (I think only an AFL guy... haven't seen him for CFL of yet) on my analysis. As I said, especially with the CFL, it's my first season following this league and I'm merely relating the league to the AFL. I listen to every game I can, thus make too many bets that I shouldn't make on this game.
When I post an AFL card, I really mean it and think I'm going 100% on every card I post (though I know that's unrealistic to say the least). When I post a CFL card, I'm fully aware that there are times I'm either making wagers under the premise of winning a small dollar amount on the game (like the Toronto/Winnepeg game on Monday or the Edmonton game the week before) when I make 3 or 4 bets that correspond with what I think is going to happen in the game from all standpoints, knowing that I'm usually looking at a maximum reward vs. minimum risk proposition. Sometimes it works out great, like the over in the BC/Calgary game last week, when I netted over 9 units on the game, something I never even tried in the AFL (mostly because I never experimented with team totals and the fact that 1st half wagers in the AFL are really dumb unless you know who's getting the ball first). Other times it doesn't, like the Winnepeg game should have been for me on Monday.
I'll drop 5 unit plays on the AFL maybe not on a weekly basis, but probably 20 5 unit plays a year. I've yet to do that in the CFL, and only this week did I bring out my 2nd 4 unit play (though I've risked as much as 10 units on an actual game).
See what I mean that I like to talk my way through things? I'm still just 20 and have a long way to go in this biz and hope to always get feedback from those higher than me in the gambling world.
I'll post what I got this week, although all lines have moved.
WIN-CAL over 52 one unit
BC -3 -120 vs. EDM one unit
EDM-BC over 55 two units
YTD: 10-6
Lean to SAS-MON under. No clue on OTT-HAM since HAM QB situation is a revolving door, but looks like Jones will start, who could look like either Tom Brady or Marcia Brady (or Marcus Brady!)
WIN-CAL over 52 one unit
BC -3 -120 vs. EDM one unit
EDM-BC over 55 two units
YTD: 10-6
Lean to SAS-MON under. No clue on OTT-HAM since HAM QB situation is a revolving door, but looks like Jones will start, who could look like either Tom Brady or Marcia Brady (or Marcus Brady!)
